You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
淡路島沿岸の神社における南海トラフ地震の津波被災リスクの検証
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering), January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2208/jscejoe.71.i_677 |
| Authors |
宇野 宏司, 高田 知紀, 辻本 剛三, 柿木 哲哉 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,718,075
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering)
#1
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,409
of 359,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering)
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 42 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them