↓ Skip to main content

Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Edwards, Marie Russell, George Thomson, Nick Wilson, Heather Gifford

Abstract

Tobacco control strategies have mainly targeted reducing demand. Supply-side focused measures, though less familiar, deserve consideration, particularly to achieve 'endgame' tobacco control aims (e.g. achieving close to zero smoking prevalence). We explored attitudes towards supply-side focused 'endgame' tobacco control approaches and how they can be best communicated with senior policymakers, journalists, and public health practitioners.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Tunisia 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Singapore 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 10 29%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 32%
Social Sciences 9 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 4 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2011.
All research outputs
#944,313
of 5,038,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,546
of 5,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,206
of 59,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#47
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,038,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.