↓ Skip to main content

Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Edwards, Marie Russell, George Thomson, Nick Wilson, Heather Gifford

Abstract

Tobacco control strategies have mainly targeted reducing demand. Supply-side focused measures, though less familiar, deserve consideration, particularly to achieve 'endgame' tobacco control aims (e.g. achieving close to zero smoking prevalence). We explored attitudes towards supply-side focused 'endgame' tobacco control approaches and how they can be best communicated with senior policymakers, journalists, and public health practitioners.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Tunisia 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Singapore 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 10 27%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 30%
Social Sciences 10 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,368,071
of 14,581,028 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,797
of 10,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,128
of 88,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,581,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them