Title |
Dispelling the myth that habitual caffeine consumption influences the performance response to acute caffeine supplementation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00260.2017 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lívia de Souza Gonçalves, Vitor de Salles Painelli, Guilherme Yamaguchi, Luana Farias de Oliveira, Bryan Saunders, Rafael Pires da Silva, Erika Maciel, Guilherme Giannini Artioli, Hamilton Roschel, Bruno Gualano |
Abstract |
To investigate the influence of habitual caffeine intake on exercise performance to acute caffeine supplementation. A double-blind, crossover, counterbalanced study was performed. Forty endurance-trained cyclists were allocated into tertiles according to their daily caffeine intake: low (58 ± 29 mg(.)d(-1)), moderate (143 ± 25 mg(.)d(-1)), and high consumers (351 ± 139 mg(.)d(-1)). Participants completed three trials in which they performed simulated cycling time-trials in the fastest time possible following ingestion of: caffeine (CAF: 6 mg(.)kg(-1) BM), placebo (PLA), and no supplement (CON). Mixed-model analysis revealed time-trial performance was significantly improved in CAF compared to PLA and CON (29.92±2.18 min vs 30.81±2.67 and 31.14±2.71 min; P = <0.0002). ANCOVA revealed no influence of habitual caffeine intake as a covariate on exercise performance (P=0.47). Time-trial performance was not significantly different between tertiles (P=0.75). No correlation was observed between habitual caffeine intake and absolute changes (CAF - CON) in time-trial performance with caffeine (P=0.524). Individual analysis showed that eight, seven and five individuals improved above the variation of the test in CAF in the low, moderate and high tertiles. A Fisher's Exact Test did not show any significant differences in the number of individuals who improved in CAF between the tertiles (P>0.05). Blood lactate and ratings of perceived exertion were not different between trials and tertiles (P>0.05). Performance effects of acute caffeine supplementation during a ~30 min cycling TT performance were not influenced by the level of habitual caffeine consumption. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 63 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 51 | 17% |
Canada | 22 | 8% |
Australia | 16 | 5% |
Spain | 12 | 4% |
Belgium | 5 | 2% |
Brazil | 4 | 1% |
Ireland | 4 | 1% |
Chile | 3 | 1% |
Other | 26 | 9% |
Unknown | 86 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 165 | 57% |
Scientists | 69 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 52 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 286 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 51 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 49 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 9% |
Researcher | 18 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 6% |
Other | 54 | 19% |
Unknown | 72 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 95 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
Other | 34 | 12% |
Unknown | 82 | 29% |