↓ Skip to main content

Maintenance agonist treatments for opiate-dependent pregnant women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maintenance agonist treatments for opiate-dependent pregnant women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006318.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Minozzi, Laura Amato, Cristina Bellisario, Marica Ferri, Marina Davoli

Abstract

The prevalence of opiate use among pregnant women can range from 1% to 2% to as high as 21%. Heroin crosses the placenta and pregnant, opiate-dependent women experience a six-fold increase in maternal obstetric complications such as low birth weight, toxaemia, third trimester bleeding, malpresentation, puerperal morbidity, fetal distress and meconium aspiration. Neonatal complications include narcotic withdrawal, postnatal growth deficiency, microcephaly, neuro-behavioural problems, increased neonatal mortality and a 74-fold increase in sudden infant death syndrome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 350 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 17%
Researcher 53 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 10%
Other 77 22%
Unknown 50 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 13%
Psychology 44 12%
Social Sciences 30 8%
Decision Sciences 6 2%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 70 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#835,176
of 14,776,086 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,461
of 11,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,045
of 257,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,776,086 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.