↓ Skip to main content

Decreased intelligence in children and exposure to fluoride and arsenic in drinking water

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,855)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
153 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decreased intelligence in children and exposure to fluoride and arsenic in drinking water
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, November 2007
DOI 10.1590/s0102-311x2007001600018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Rocha-Amador, Maria Elena Navarro, Leticia Carrizales, Raúl Morales, Jaqueline Calderón

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that fluoride (F) and arsenic (As) may adversely affect intelligence quotient (IQ) scores. We explore the association between exposure to F and As in drinking water and intelligence in children. Three rural communities in Mexico with contrasting levels of F and As in drinking water were studied: Moctezuma (F 0.8+/-1.4 mg/L; As 5.8+/-1.3 microg/L); Salitral (F 5.3+/-0.9 mg/L; As 169+/-0.9 microg/L) and 5 de Febrero (F 9.4+/-0.9 mg/L; As 194+/-1.3 microg/L). The final study sample consisted of 132 children from 6 to 10 years old. After controlling for confounders, an inverse association was observed between F in urine and Performance, Verbal, and Full IQ scores (beta values = -13, -15.6, -16.9, respectively). Similar results were observed for F in drinking water (beta values = -6.7, -11.2, -10.2, respectively) and As in drinking water (beta values= -4.30, -6.40, -6.15, respectively). The p-values for all cases were < 0.001. A significant association was observed between As in urine and Full IQ scores (beta = -5.72, p = 0.003). These data suggest that children exposed to either F or As have increased risks of reduced IQ scores.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 142 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Environmental Science 19 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Psychology 11 8%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 41 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#229,544
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#6
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325
of 90,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.