↓ Skip to main content

A stratified random survey of the proportion of poor quality oral artesunate sold at medicine outlets in the Lao PDR – implications for therapeutic failure and drug resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A stratified random survey of the proportion of poor quality oral artesunate sold at medicine outlets in the Lao PDR – implications for therapeutic failure and drug resistance
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sivong Sengaloundeth, Michael D Green, Facundo M Fernández, Ot Manolin, Khamlieng Phommavong, Vongsavanh Insixiengmay, Christina Y Hampton, Leonard Nyadong, Dallas C Mildenhall, Dana Hostetler, Lamphet Khounsaknalath, Latsamy Vongsack, Samlane Phompida, Viengxay Vanisaveth, Lamphone Syhakhang, Paul N Newton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 5%
United States 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Chemistry 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,527,793
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,468
of 5,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,474
of 111,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.