↓ Skip to main content

Ebstein’s anomaly may be caused by mutations in the sarcomere protein gene MYH7

Overview of attention for article published in Netherlands Heart Journal, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ebstein’s anomaly may be caused by mutations in the sarcomere protein gene MYH7
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12471-011-0141-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. van Engelen, A. V. Postma, J. B. A. van de Meerakker, J. W. Roos-Hesselink, A. T. J. M. Helderman-van den Enden, H. W. Vliegen, T. Rahman, M. J. H. Baars, J-W Sels, U. Bauer, T. Pickardt, S. R. Sperling, A. F. M. Moorman, B. Keavney, J. Goodship, S. Klaassen, B. J. M. Mulder, van Engelen K, Postma AV, van de Meerakker JB, Roos-Hesselink JW, Helderman-van den Enden AT, Vliegen HW, Rahman T, Baars MJ, Sels JW, Bauer U, Pickardt T, Sperling SR, Moorman AF, Keavney B, Goodship J, Klaassen S, Mulder BJ

Abstract

Ebstein's anomaly is a rare congenital heart malformation characterised by adherence of the septal and posterior leaflets of the tricuspid valve to the underlying myocardium. Associated abnormalities of left ventricular morphology and function including left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) have been observed. An association between Ebstein's anomaly with LVNC and mutations in the sarcomeric protein gene MYH7, encoding β-myosin heavy chain, has been shown by recent studies. This might represent a specific subtype of Ebstein's anomaly with a Mendelian inheritance pattern. In this review we discuss the association of MYH7 mutations with Ebstein's anomaly and LVNC and its implications for the clinical care for patients and their family members.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Other 3 21%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 71%
Unspecified 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2013.
All research outputs
#5,488,722
of 9,728,443 outputs
Outputs from Netherlands Heart Journal
#123
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,456
of 191,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Netherlands Heart Journal
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,728,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.