↓ Skip to main content

Using intervention mapping to develop a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent childhood obesity: the HAPPY (Healthy and Active Parenting Programme for Early Years) study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
471 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using intervention mapping to develop a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent childhood obesity: the HAPPY (Healthy and Active Parenting Programme for Early Years) study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie J Taylor, Pinki Sahota, Judith Sargent, Sally Barber, Jackie Loach, Gemma Louch, John Wright

Abstract

Interventions that make extensive use of theory tend to have larger effects on behaviour. The Intervention Mapping (IM) framework incorporates theory into intervention design, implementation and evaluation, and was applied to the development of a community-based childhood obesity prevention intervention for a multi-ethnic population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 463 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 12%
Student > Bachelor 54 11%
Researcher 53 11%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Other 95 20%
Unknown 113 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 14%
Psychology 60 13%
Social Sciences 57 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Other 53 11%
Unknown 121 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2014.
All research outputs
#2,588,165
of 25,470,300 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#897
of 2,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,675
of 319,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,470,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.