↓ Skip to main content

Passive movements for the treatment and prevention of contractures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Passive movements for the treatment and prevention of contractures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009331.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rama KR Prabhu, Narasimman Swaminathan, Lisa A Harvey

Abstract

Contractures, a common complication following immobility, lead to restricted joint range of motion. Passive movements (PMs) are widely used for the treatment and prevention of contractures; however, it is not clear whether they are effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 238 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 26%
Researcher 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Unspecified 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 74 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 18%
Unspecified 34 14%
Neuroscience 11 4%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 37 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#447,943
of 13,444,619 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,362
of 10,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,777
of 254,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,444,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.