↓ Skip to main content

Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide predict successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a prospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide predict successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a prospective observational study
Published in
Critical Care, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc7009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miran Kolar, Miljenko Krizmaric, Petra Klemen, Stefek Grmec

Abstract

Prognosis in patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is poor. Higher survival rates have been observed only in patients with ventricular fibrillation who were fortunate enough to have basic and advanced life support initiated soon after cardiac arrest. An ability to predict cardiac arrest outcomes would be useful for resuscitation. Changes in expired end-tidal carbon dioxide levels during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be a useful, noninvasive predictor of successful resuscitation and survival from cardiac arrest, and could help in determining when to cease CPR efforts.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 109 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 21%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Engineering 4 3%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 11 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,436,949
of 14,354,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,363
of 4,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,399
of 258,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#31
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,354,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.