You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic map protocol: which components or attributes of biodiversity affect which dimensions of poverty?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-2-8 |
| Authors |
Dilys Roe, Chris Sandbrook, Max Fancourt, Bjorn Schulte, Robert Munroe, Mxolisi Sibanda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Researcher | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#301
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,607
of 204,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.