↓ Skip to main content

Production of L-carnitine by secondary metabolism of bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Production of L-carnitine by secondary metabolism of bacteria
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, October 2007
DOI 10.1186/1475-2859-6-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicente Bernal, Ángel Sevilla, Manuel Cánovas, José L Iborra

Abstract

The increasing commercial demand for L-carnitine has led to a multiplication of efforts to improve its production with bacteria. The use of different cell environments, such as growing, resting, permeabilized, dried, osmotically stressed, freely suspended and immobilized cells, to maintain enzymes sufficiently active for L-carnitine production is discussed in the text. The different cell states of enterobacteria, such as Escherichia coli and Proteus sp., which can be used to produce L-carnitine from crotonobetaine or D-carnitine as substrate, are analyzed. Moreover, the combined application of both bioprocess and metabolic engineering has allowed a deeper understanding of the main factors controlling the production process, such as energy depletion and the alteration of the acetyl-CoA/CoA ratio which are coupled to the end of the biotransformation. Furthermore, the profiles of key central metabolic activities such as the TCA cycle, the glyoxylate shunt and the acetate metabolism are seen to be closely interrelated and affect the biotransformation efficiency. Although genetically modified strains have been obtained, new strain improvement strategies are still needed, especially in Escherichia coli as a model organism for molecular biology studies. This review aims to summarize and update the state of the art in L-carnitine production using E. coli and Proteus sp, emphasizing the importance of proper reactor design and operation strategies, together with metabolic engineering aspects and the need for feed-back between wet and in silico work to optimize this biotransformation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Latvia 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Chemistry 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Chemical Engineering 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,420,242
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#1,375
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,590
of 72,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.