↓ Skip to main content

Abdominally implanted satellite transmitters affect reproduction and survival rather than migration of large shorebirds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abdominally implanted satellite transmitters affect reproduction and survival rather than migration of large shorebirds
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10336-013-1026-4
Authors

Jos C. E. W. Hooijmeijer, Robert E. Gill, Daniel M. Mulcahy, T. Lee Tibbitts, Rosemarie Kentie, Gerrit J. Gerritsen, Leo W. Bruinzeel, David C. Tijssen, Christopher M. Harwood, Theunis Piersma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Latvia 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 45 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 64%
Environmental Science 12 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,522,893
of 12,475,873 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#701
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,408
of 237,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#20
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,475,873 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.