You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Abdominally implanted satellite transmitters affect reproduction and survival rather than migration of large shorebirds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-013-1026-4 |
| Authors |
Jos C. E. W. Hooijmeijer, Robert E. Gill, Daniel M. Mulcahy, T. Lee Tibbitts, Rosemarie Kentie, Gerrit J. Gerritsen, Leo W. Bruinzeel, David C. Tijssen, Christopher M. Harwood, Theunis Piersma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Latvia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#1,505
of 1,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,160
of 227,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#26
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.