↓ Skip to main content

Abdominally implanted satellite transmitters affect reproduction and survival rather than migration of large shorebirds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abdominally implanted satellite transmitters affect reproduction and survival rather than migration of large shorebirds
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10336-013-1026-4
Authors

Jos C. E. W. Hooijmeijer, Robert E. Gill, Daniel M. Mulcahy, T. Lee Tibbitts, Rosemarie Kentie, Gerrit J. Gerritsen, Leo W. Bruinzeel, David C. Tijssen, Christopher M. Harwood, Theunis Piersma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Latvia 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 58%
Environmental Science 14 22%
Psychology 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2014.
All research outputs
#12,043,825
of 15,794,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#914
of 1,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,232
of 265,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,794,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.