↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Vitamin E and Memantine on Functional Decline in Alzheimer Disease: The TEAM-AD VA Cooperative Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
64 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
277 tweeters
facebook
131 Facebook pages
googleplus
9 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
255 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Effect of Vitamin E and Memantine on Functional Decline in Alzheimer Disease: The TEAM-AD VA Cooperative Randomized Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.282834
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurice W. Dysken, Mary Sano, Sanjay Asthana, Julia E. Vertrees, Muralidhar Pallaki, Maria Llorente, Susan Love, Gerard D. Schellenberg, J. Riley McCarten, Julie Malphurs, Susana Prieto, Peijun Chen, David J. Loreck, George Trapp, Rajbir S. Bakshi, Jacobo E. Mintzer, Judith L. Heidebrink, Ana Vidal-Cardona, Lillian M. Arroyo, Angel R. Cruz, Sally Zachariah, Neil W. Kowall, Mohit P. Chopra, Suzanne Craft, Stephen Thielke, Carolyn L. Turvey, Catherine Woodman, Kimberly A. Monnell, Kimberly Gordon, Julie Tomaska, Yoav Segal, Peter N. Peduzzi, Peter D. Guarino

Abstract

Although vitamin E and memantine have been shown to have beneficial effects in moderately severe Alzheimer disease (AD), evidence is limited in mild to moderate AD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 277 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 339 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 87 25%
Student > Master 55 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 11%
Researcher 37 10%
Student > Postgraduate 28 8%
Other 109 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 19%
Unspecified 39 11%
Neuroscience 20 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 5%
Other 69 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 783. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,836
of 13,643,288 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#198
of 25,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105
of 254,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,643,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.