↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Vitamin E and Memantine on Functional Decline in Alzheimer Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
70 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
275 tweeters
facebook
129 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
9 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
384 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
556 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Effect of Vitamin E and Memantine on Functional Decline in Alzheimer Disease
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.282834
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurice W. Dysken, Mary Sano, Sanjay Asthana, Julia E. Vertrees, Muralidhar Pallaki, Maria Llorente, Susan Love, Gerard D. Schellenberg, J. Riley McCarten, Julie Malphurs, Susana Prieto, Peijun Chen, David J. Loreck, George Trapp, Rajbir S. Bakshi, Jacobo E. Mintzer, Judith L. Heidebrink, Ana Vidal-Cardona, Lillian M. Arroyo, Angel R. Cruz, Sally Zachariah, Neil W. Kowall, Mohit P. Chopra, Suzanne Craft, Stephen Thielke, Carolyn L. Turvey, Catherine Woodman, Kimberly A. Monnell, Kimberly Gordon, Julie Tomaska, Yoav Segal, Peter N. Peduzzi, Peter D. Guarino

Abstract

Although vitamin E and memantine have been shown to have beneficial effects in moderately severe Alzheimer disease (AD), evidence is limited in mild to moderate AD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 275 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 556 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 541 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 119 21%
Student > Master 81 15%
Researcher 57 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 10%
Student > Postgraduate 43 8%
Other 116 21%
Unknown 87 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 169 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 34 6%
Neuroscience 29 5%
Other 94 17%
Unknown 112 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 825. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2022.
All research outputs
#16,165
of 21,429,365 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#449
of 31,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117
of 303,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#6
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,429,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.