↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Vitamin E and Memantine on Functional Decline in Alzheimer Disease: The TEAM-AD VA Cooperative Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
64 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
278 tweeters
facebook
131 Facebook pages
googleplus
9 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Effect of Vitamin E and Memantine on Functional Decline in Alzheimer Disease: The TEAM-AD VA Cooperative Randomized Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.282834
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurice W. Dysken, Mary Sano, Sanjay Asthana, Julia E. Vertrees, Muralidhar Pallaki, Maria Llorente, Susan Love, Gerard D. Schellenberg, J. Riley McCarten, Julie Malphurs, Susana Prieto, Peijun Chen, David J. Loreck, George Trapp, Rajbir S. Bakshi, Jacobo E. Mintzer, Judith L. Heidebrink, Ana Vidal-Cardona, Lillian M. Arroyo, Angel R. Cruz, Sally Zachariah, Neil W. Kowall, Mohit P. Chopra, Suzanne Craft, Stephen Thielke, Carolyn L. Turvey, Catherine Woodman, Kimberly A. Monnell, Kimberly Gordon, Julie Tomaska, Yoav Segal, Peter N. Peduzzi, Peter D. Guarino

Abstract

Although vitamin E and memantine have been shown to have beneficial effects in moderately severe Alzheimer disease (AD), evidence is limited in mild to moderate AD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 278 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 365 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 23%
Student > Master 59 16%
Researcher 40 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 10%
Student > Postgraduate 29 8%
Other 98 26%
Unknown 26 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 149 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 18%
Psychology 25 7%
Neuroscience 20 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 5%
Other 58 15%
Unknown 42 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 783. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,324
of 14,122,915 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#208
of 26,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105
of 256,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,122,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.