↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of internal validation techniques for multifactor dimensionality reduction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of internal validation techniques for multifactor dimensionality reduction
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-11-394
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacey J Winham, Andrew J Slater, Alison A Motsinger-Reif

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 9 25%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Computer Science 4 11%
Engineering 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,527,793
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,036
of 7,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,988
of 95,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#24
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.