You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Publication and Reporting of Test Accuracy Studies Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Chemistry, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1373/clinchem.2013.218149 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniël A. Korevaar, Eleanor A. Ochodo, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Lotty Hooft |
Abstract |
Failure to publish and selective reporting are recognized problems in the biomedical literature, but their extent in the field of diagnostic testing is unknown. We aimed to identify nonpublication and discrepancies between registered records and publications among registered test accuracy studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
China | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
Professor | 4 | 13% |
Librarian | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 42% |
Psychology | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,703,977
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#6,150
of 7,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,270
of 226,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.