↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel dualplate fixation method for proximal humeral fractures without medial support

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomechanical evaluation of a novel dualplate fixation method for proximal humeral fractures without medial support
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0573-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu He, Yaoshen Zhang, Yan Wang, Dongsheng Zhou, Fu Wang

Abstract

Comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus are generally treated with the locking plate system, and clinical results are satisfactory. However, unstable support of the medial column results in varus malunion and screw perforation. We designed a novel medial anatomical locking plate (MLP) to directly support the medial column. Theoretically, the combined application of locking plate and MLP (LPMP) would directly provide strong dual-column stability. We hypothesized that the LPMP could provide greater construct stability than the locking plate alone (LP), locking plate combined with a fibular graft (LPSG), and locking plate combined with a distal radius plate (LPDP). LP, LPMP, LPSG, and LPDP implants were instrumented into the finite element model of a proximal humeral fracture. Axial, shear, and rotational loads were applied to the models under normal and osteoporotic bone conditions. The whole simulation was repeated five times for each fixator. To assess the biomechanical characteristics, the construct stiffness, fracture micromotion, stress distribution, and neck-shaft angle (NSA) were compared. The LPMP group showed significantly greater integral and regional construct stiffness, and endured less von Mises stresses, than the other three fixation methods. The stresses on the lateral locking plate were dispersed by the MLP. The LPMP group showed the least change in NSA. From the finite element viewpoint, the LPMP method provided both lateral and medial direct support. The LPMP system was effective in treating proximal humeral fracture with an unstable medial column.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Engineering 8 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,547,867
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#963
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,454
of 310,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#28
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.