↓ Skip to main content

How does multiple testing correction work?

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
57 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2028 Mendeley
citeulike
71 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How does multiple testing correction work?
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, December 2009
DOI 10.1038/nbt1209-1135
Pubmed ID
Authors

William S Noble

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,028 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 52 3%
United Kingdom 25 1%
Germany 20 <1%
Spain 11 <1%
Brazil 10 <1%
Netherlands 10 <1%
Canada 10 <1%
China 7 <1%
France 6 <1%
Other 75 4%
Unknown 1802 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 615 30%
Researcher 489 24%
Student > Master 236 12%
Student > Bachelor 144 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 116 6%
Other 323 16%
Unknown 105 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 864 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 356 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 142 7%
Computer Science 124 6%
Neuroscience 66 3%
Other 302 15%
Unknown 174 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#380,045
of 15,744,499 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#810
of 7,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,707
of 92,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#3
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,744,499 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.