↓ Skip to main content

PROSPERO’s progress and activities 2012/13

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PROSPERO’s progress and activities 2012/13
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Booth

Abstract

PROSPERO is an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care. Between July 2012 and June 2013, 1,106 registrations were added, bringing the total since launch in February 2011 to 1,704. The value of the growing number of records is reflected in a 117% increase in page views in the first half of 2013 compared with the first half of 2012. Developments over the year included expansion of scope, improvement of the registration form and easier access to information on how to register.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 43%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Psychology 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,606,821
of 6,229,412 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#412
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,700
of 144,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,229,412 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.