↓ Skip to main content

Bioltelemetery data for golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) captured in coastal southern California, February 2016–February 2017

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioltelemetery data for golden eagles (<em>Aquila chrysaetos</em>) captured in coastal southern California, February 2016–February 2017
Published in
US Geological Survey, May 2017
DOI 10.3133/ds1051
Authors

Tracey, Jeff A., Madden, Melanie C., Sebes, Jeremy B., Bloom, Peter H., Katzner, Todd E., Fisher, Robert N.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,290,984
of 11,411,580 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#625
of 1,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,038
of 264,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#70
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,411,580 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.