↓ Skip to main content

Easi-CRISPR: a robust method for one-step generation of mice carrying conditional and insertion alleles using long ssDNA donors and CRISPR ribonucleoproteins

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
102 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
423 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
724 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Easi-CRISPR: a robust method for one-step generation of mice carrying conditional and insertion alleles using long ssDNA donors and CRISPR ribonucleoproteins
Published in
Genome Biology, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13059-017-1220-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rolen M. Quadros, Hiromi Miura, Donald W. Harms, Hisako Akatsuka, Takehito Sato, Tomomi Aida, Ronald Redder, Guy P. Richardson, Yutaka Inagaki, Daisuke Sakai, Shannon M. Buckley, Parthasarathy Seshacharyulu, Surinder K. Batra, Mark A. Behlke, Sarah A. Zeiner, Ashley M. Jacobi, Yayoi Izu, Wallace B. Thoreson, Lisa D. Urness, Suzanne L. Mansour, Masato Ohtsuka, Channabasavaiah B. Gurumurthy

Abstract

Conditional knockout mice and transgenic mice expressing recombinases, reporters, and inducible transcriptional activators are key for many genetic studies and comprise over 90% of mouse models created. Conditional knockout mice are generated using labor-intensive methods of homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells and are available for only ~25% of all mouse genes. Transgenic mice generated by random genomic insertion approaches pose problems of unreliable expression, and thus there is a need for targeted-insertion models. Although CRISPR-based strategies were reported to create conditional and targeted-insertion alleles via one-step delivery of targeting components directly to zygotes, these strategies are quite inefficient. Here we describe Easi-CRISPR (Efficient additions with ssDNA inserts-CRISPR), a targeting strategy in which long single-stranded DNA donors are injected with pre-assembled crRNA + tracrRNA + Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (ctRNP) complexes into mouse zygotes. We show for over a dozen loci that Easi-CRISPR generates correctly targeted conditional and insertion alleles in 8.5-100% of the resulting live offspring. Easi-CRISPR solves the major problem of animal genome engineering, namely the inefficiency of targeted DNA cassette insertion. The approach is robust, succeeding for all tested loci. It is versatile, generating both conditional and targeted insertion alleles. Finally, it is highly efficient, as treating an average of only 50 zygotes is sufficient to produce a correctly targeted allele in up to 100% of live offspring. Thus, Easi-CRISPR offers a comprehensive means of building large-scale Cre-LoxP animal resources.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 724 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 720 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 162 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 144 20%
Student > Bachelor 54 7%
Student > Master 50 7%
Other 36 5%
Other 100 14%
Unknown 178 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 230 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 160 22%
Neuroscience 43 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 4%
Other 47 6%
Unknown 185 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 127. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#356,138
of 26,669,772 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#149
of 4,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,988
of 332,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#5
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,669,772 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.