↓ Skip to main content

Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
83 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007115.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lunn MP, Hughes RA, Wiffen PJ, Lunn, Michael PT, Hughes, Richard AC, Wiffen, Philip J

Abstract

Duloxetine is a balanced serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor licensed for the treatment of major depressive disorders, urinary stress incontinence and the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. A number of trials have been conducted to investigate the use of duloxetine in neuropathic and nociceptive painful conditions. This is the first update of a review first published in 2010.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 267 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 16%
Student > Master 43 15%
Other 34 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Other 98 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 8%
Psychology 22 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Unspecified 20 7%
Other 47 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#190,660
of 11,490,870 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#566
of 9,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,826
of 198,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,490,870 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.