↓ Skip to main content

Acute stimulation effect of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum in patients with refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder – a double-blinded trial

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute stimulation effect of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum in patients with refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder – a double-blinded trial
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s54964
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shin-Yuan Chen, Hsin-Chi Tsai, Chun-Hung Chang, Hung-Jen Hsieh, Sheng-Tzung Tsai, Jiann_I Pan, Hsiang-Yi Hung

Abstract

Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) for treating refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has shown positive results in small clinical trials. Ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) is one of the promising targets; however, whether or not acute stimulation test can provide substantial information for chronic stimulation is not yet known. We evaluated postoperative test stimulation and examined the relationship of acute simulation-induced smile/laughter and 15-month clinical outcome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 61 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 44%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,289,831
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,778
of 2,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,966
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#38
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.