↓ Skip to main content

Wafer-scale design of lightweight and transparent electronics that wraps around hairs

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
15 X users
patent
8 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
286 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wafer-scale design of lightweight and transparent electronics that wraps around hairs
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms3982
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni A. Salvatore, Niko Münzenrieder, Thomas Kinkeldei, Luisa Petti, Christoph Zysset, Ivo Strebel, Lars Büthe, Gerhard Tröster

Abstract

Electronics on very thin substrates have shown remarkable bendability, conformability and lightness, which are important attributes for biological tissues sensing, wearable or implantable devices. Here we propose a wafer-scale process scheme to realize ultra flexible, lightweight and transparent electronics on top of a 1-μm thick parylene film that is released from the carrier substrate after the dissolution in water of a polyvinyl- alcohol layer. The thin substrate ensures extreme flexibility, which is demonstrated by transistors that continue to work when wrapped around human hairs. In parallel, the use of amorphous oxide semiconductor and high-K dielectric enables the realization of analogue amplifiers operating at 12 V and above 1 MHz. Electronics can be transferred on any object, surface and on biological tissues like human skin and plant leaves. We foresee a potential application as smart contact lenses, covered with light, transparent and flexible devices, which could serve to monitor intraocular pressure for glaucoma disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 312 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 31%
Researcher 55 17%
Student > Master 51 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 4%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 44 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 123 38%
Materials Science 55 17%
Physics and Astronomy 34 10%
Chemistry 23 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 59 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#163,795
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,350
of 46,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,598
of 304,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#22
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.