You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Insurance data for research in companion animals: benefits and limitations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1751-0147-51-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Agneta Egenvall, Ane Nødtvedt, Johanna Penell, Lotta Gunnarsson, Brenda N Bonnett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 27% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 12 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,089,160
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#27
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,761
of 107,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them