↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of Optimizing Acute Stroke Care Services for Thrombolysis

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Optimizing Acute Stroke Care Services for Thrombolysis
Published in
Stroke, February 2014
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.113.003216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Cristina Penaloza-Ramos, James P. Sheppard, Sue Jowett, Pelham Barton, Jonathan Mant, Tom Quinn, Ruth M. Mellor, Don Sims, David Sandler, Richard J. McManus, Peter Carr, Sheila Greenfield, Brin Helliwell, Cristina Nand, Norman Phillips, Rob Scott, Satinder Singh, Matthew Ward

Abstract

Thrombolysis in acute stroke is effective up to 4.5 hours after symptom onset but relies on early recognition, prompt arrival in hospital, and timely brain scanning. This study aimed to establish the cost-effectiveness of increasing thrombolysis rates through a series of hypothetical change strategies designed to optimize the acute care pathway for stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 27%
Student > Master 9 17%
Unspecified 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 35%
Unspecified 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Other 11 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#755,320
of 12,015,871 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#843
of 7,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,115
of 207,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#18
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,015,871 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.