↓ Skip to main content

Improving the uptake of preconception care and periconceptional folate supplementation: what do women think?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the uptake of preconception care and periconceptional folate supplementation: what do women think?
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-786
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle Mazza, Anna Chapman

Abstract

Despite strong evidence of the benefits of preconception interventions to improve pregnancy outcomes, the delivery and uptake of preconception care in general and periconceptional folate supplementation in particular remains low. The aim of this study was to determine women's views of the barriers and enablers to the uptake of preconception care and periconceptional folate supplementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 25%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,280,744
of 23,477,147 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,796
of 15,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,091
of 185,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#113
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,477,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.