You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Age-related decline in cognitive control: the role of fluid intelligence and processing speed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-15-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marine Manard, Delphine Carabin, Mathieu Jaspar, Fabienne Collette |
| Abstract |
Research on cognitive control suggests an age-related decline in proactive control abilities whereas reactive control seems to remain intact. However, the reason of the differential age effect on cognitive control efficiency is still unclear. This study investigated the potential influence of fluid intelligence and processing speed on the selective age-related decline in proactive control. Eighty young and 80 healthy older adults were included in this study. The participants were submitted to a working memory recognition paradigm, assessing proactive and reactive cognitive control by manipulating the interference level across items. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 23% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 58 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,465,129
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#32
of 1,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,139
of 310,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.