↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Truflex™ articulating stylet versus conventional rigid Portex™ stylet as an intubation guide with the D-blade of C-Mac™ videolaryngoscope during elective tracheal intubation: study…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Truflex™ articulating stylet versus conventional rigid Portex™ stylet as an intubation guide with the D-blade of C-Mac™ videolaryngoscope during elective tracheal intubation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-298
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aida Al-Qasmi, Wafa Al-Alawi, Azharuddin Mohammed Malik, Rashid Manzoor Khan, Naresh Kaul

Abstract

A variety of videolaryngoscopes with angulated blade have been recently introduced into clinical practice. They provide an indirect view of the glottic structures in normal and challenging clinical settings. Despite the very good visualization of the laryngeal structures by these devices, the insertion and advancement of the endotracheal tube may be prolonged and occasionally fail as it does not conform to the enhanced angulation of the blade. To overcome this handicap, it is recommended to use a pre-shaped, styleted tracheal tube during intubation. Unfortunately, these malleable rigid stylets permit only a fixed shape to the advancing endotracheal tube. This may necessitate withdrawal of endotracheal tube-stylet assembly for reshaping, before undertaking a new attempt. This may cause soft tissue injury and hemodynamic disturbance.This single-blinded randomized clinical trial aims to overcome these handicaps using a novel method of dynamically changing the shape of the advancing endotracheal tube by Truflex articulating stylet as per need during D-blade C-Mac videolaryngoscopy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 8 14%
Other 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 26%