You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolic-network-driven analysis of bacterial ecological strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r61 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shiri Freilich, Anat Kreimer, Elhanan Borenstein, Nir Yosef, Roded Sharan, Uri Gophna, Eytan Ruppin |
| Abstract |
The growth-rate of an organism is an important phenotypic trait, directly affecting its ability to survive in a given environment. Here we present the first large scale computational study of the association between ecological strategies and growth rate across 113 bacterial species, occupying a variety of metabolic habitats. Genomic data are used to reconstruct the species' metabolic networks and habitable metabolic environments. These reconstructions are then used to investigate the typical ecological strategies taken by organisms in terms of two basic species-specific measures: metabolic variability--the ability of a species to survive in a variety of different environments; and co-habitation score vector--the distribution of other species that co-inhabit each environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 229 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 26% |
| Researcher | 65 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 130 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 5% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,619,624
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,741
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,167
of 125,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.