↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of tenofovir gel in urban South Africa: model projections of HIV impact and threshold product prices

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of tenofovir gel in urban South Africa: model projections of HIV impact and threshold product prices
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fern Terris-Prestholt, Anna M Foss, Andrew P Cox, Lori Heise, Gesine Meyer-Rath, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe, Thomas Mertenskoetter, Helen Rees, Peter Vickerman, Charlotte H Watts

Abstract

There is urgent need for effective HIV prevention methods that women can initiate. The CAPRISA 004 trial showed that a tenofovir-based vaginal microbicide had significant impact on HIV incidence among women. This study uses the trial findings to estimate the population-level impact of the gel on HIV and HSV-2 transmission, and price thresholds at which widespread product introduction would be as cost-effective as male circumcision in urban South Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Social Sciences 15 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 26 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,325,144
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,275
of 7,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,737
of 304,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#57
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.