↓ Skip to main content

Water-based exercise training for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Water-based exercise training for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008290.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renae J McNamara, Zoe J McKeough, David K McKenzie, Jennifer A Alison

Abstract

Land-based exercise training improves exercise capacity and quality of life in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Water-based exercise training is an alternative mode of physical exercise training that may appeal to the older population attending pulmonary rehabilitation programmes, those who are unable to complete land-based exercise programmes and people with COPD with comorbid physical and medical conditions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 241 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Other 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 61 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 19%
Sports and Recreations 12 5%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 69 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,058,938
of 19,188,609 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,632
of 11,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,425
of 286,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,188,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.