↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the efficiency of environmental monitoring programs

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Indicators, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the efficiency of environmental monitoring programs
Published in
Ecological Indicators, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.010
Authors

Carrie R. Levine, Ruth D. Yanai, Gregory G. Lampman, Douglas A. Burns, Charles T. Driscoll, Gregory B. Lawrence, Jason A. Lynch, Nina Schoch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Brazil 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Belgium 2 1%
Malta 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 159 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 20%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 14 8%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 16 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 74 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 5%
Engineering 8 4%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 26 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,681,442
of 14,268,610 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#901
of 1,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,887
of 258,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#32
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,268,610 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.