You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whole genome comparison between table and wine grapes reveals a comprehensive catalog of structural variants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-14-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Di Genova, Andrea Miyasaka Almeida, Claudia Muñoz-Espinoza, Paula Vizoso, Dante Travisany, Carol Moraga, Manuel Pinto, Patricio Hinrichsen, Ariel Orellana, Alejandro Maass |
| Abstract |
Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) is the most important Mediterranean fruit crop, used to produce both wine and spirits as well as table grape and raisins. Wine and table grape cultivars represent two divergent germplasm pools with different origins and domestication history, as well as differential characteristics for berry size, cluster architecture and berry chemical profile, among others. 'Sultanina' plays a pivotal role in modern table grape breeding providing the main source of seedlessness. This cultivar is also one of the most planted for fresh consumption and raisins production. Given its importance, we sequenced it and implemented a novel strategy for the de novo assembly of its highly heterozygous genome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#18,360,179
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#2,079
of 3,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,637
of 304,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#63
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.