↓ Skip to main content

Whole genome comparison between table and wine grapes reveals a comprehensive catalog of structural variants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole genome comparison between table and wine grapes reveals a comprehensive catalog of structural variants
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-14-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Di Genova, Andrea Almeida, Claudia Muñoz-Espinoza, Paula Vizoso, Dante Travisany, Carol Moraga, Manuel Pinto, Patricio Hinrichsen, Ariel Orellana, Alejandro Maass

Abstract

Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) is the most important Mediterranean fruit crop, used to produce both wine and spirits as well as table grape and raisins. Wine and table grape cultivars represent two divergent germplasm pools with different origins and domestication history, as well as differential characteristics for berry size, cluster architecture and berry chemical profile, among others. 'Sultanina' plays a pivotal role in modern table grape breeding providing the main source of seedlessness. This cultivar is also one of the most planted for fresh consumption and raisins production. Given its importance, we sequenced it and implemented a novel strategy for the de novo assembly of its highly heterozygous genome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 134 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 22%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 9 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 10%
Computer Science 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 15 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#9,535,609
of 12,410,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#918
of 1,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,597
of 231,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#61
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,410,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.