↓ Skip to main content

Short single-stranded DNA degradation products augment the activation of Toll-like receptor 9

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short single-stranded DNA degradation products augment the activation of Toll-like receptor 9
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms15363
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jelka Pohar, Duško Lainšček, Karolina Ivičak-Kocjan, Miša-Mojca Cajnko, Roman Jerala, Mojca Benčina

Abstract

Toll-like receptors encounter a diversity of degradation products in endosomes. TLR7 and TLR8 have been shown to be activated by RNA degradation products. Here we show that although TLR9 requires single-stranded DNA longer than 20 nucleotides for a robust response, TLR9 activation is augmented by CpG-containing oligodeoxyribonucleotides (sODNs) as short as 2 nucleotides, which, by themselves, do not induce activation in cell cultures, as well as in mice. sODNs also activate human TLR9 in combination with ODNs containing a single CpG motif that by themselves do not activate human TLR9. The specific sequence motif of sODN and colocalization of ODN and sODN suggest that the mechanism of activation involves binding of both ODN and sODN to TLR9. sODNs augment TLR9 activation by mammalian genomic DNA indicating the role of short DNA degradation products in the endosomes in response to infection or in autoimmune disease, particularly at limiting concentrations of ODNs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 14%
Chemistry 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 9 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,015,980
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#24,329
of 48,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,074
of 314,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#573
of 1,052 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,052 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.