↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating oral lichen planus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating oral lichen planus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001168.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kobkan Thongprasom, Marco Carrozzo, Susan Furness, Giovanni Lodi

Abstract

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a common chronic autoimmune disease associated with cell-mediated immunological dysfunction. Symptomatic OLP is painful and complete healing is rare.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 25%
Unspecified 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Other 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 63%
Unspecified 27 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 7 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,702,980
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,873
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,547
of 84,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.