↓ Skip to main content

Primary Human Lung Alveolus‐on‐a‐chip Model of Intravascular Thrombosis for Assessment of Therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary Human Lung Alveolus‐on‐a‐chip Model of Intravascular Thrombosis for Assessment of Therapeutics
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/cpt.742
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Jain, R Barrile, AD van der Meer, A Mammoto, T Mammoto, K De Ceunynck, O Aisiku, MA Otieno, CS Louden, GA Hamilton, R Flaumenhaft, DE Ingber

Abstract

Pulmonary thrombosis is a significant cause of patient mortality, however, there are no effective in vitro models of thrombi formation in human lung microvessels, that could also assess therapeutics and toxicology of antithrombotic drugs. Here we show that a microfluidic lung alveolus-on-a-chip lined by human primary alveolar epithelium interfaced with endothelium, and cultured under flowing whole blood can be used to perform quantitative analysis of organ-level contributions to inflammation-induced thrombosis. This microfluidic chip recapitulates in vivo responses, including platelet-endothelial dynamics and revealed that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin indirectly stimulates intravascular thrombosis by activating the alveolar epithelium, rather than acting directly on endothelium. This model is also used to analyze inhibition of endothelial activation and thrombosis due to a protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) antagonist, demonstrating its ability to dissect complex responses and identify antithrombotic therapeutics. Thus, this methodology offers a new approach to study human pathophysiology of pulmonary thrombosis and advance drug development. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 397 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 19%
Student > Master 65 16%
Researcher 43 11%
Student > Bachelor 34 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 41 10%
Unknown 118 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 71 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 3%
Other 52 13%
Unknown 141 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#634,303
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#65
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,736
of 312,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.