You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential proteomic analysis of synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Proteomics, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1559-0275-11-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lavanya Balakrishnan, Mitali Bhattacharjee, Sartaj Ahmad, Raja Sekhar Nirujogi, Santosh Renuse, Yashwanth Subbannayya, Arivusudar Marimuthu, Srinivas M Srikanth, Rajesh Raju, Mukesh Dhillon, Navjyot Kaur, Ramesh Jois, Vivek Vasudev, YL Ramachandra, Nandini A Sahasrabuddhe, TS Keshava Prasad, Sujatha Mohan, Harsha Gowda, Subramanian Shankar, Akhilesh Pandey |
| Abstract |
Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis are two common musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints. Despite high prevalence rates, etiological factors involved in these disorders remain largely unknown. Dissecting the molecular aspects of these disorders will significantly contribute to improving their diagnosis and clinical management. In order to identify proteins that are differentially expressed between these two conditions, a quantitative proteomic profiling of synovial fluid obtained from rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients was carried out by using iTRAQ labeling followed by high resolution mass spectrometry analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Guinea | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,343,025
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#46
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,854
of 308,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.