↓ Skip to main content

Treatment compliance and effectiveness of a cognitive behavioural intervention for low back pain: a complier average causal effect approach to the BeST data set

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Treatment compliance and effectiveness of a cognitive behavioural intervention for low back pain: a complier average causal effect approach to the BeST data set
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher R Knox, Ranjit Lall, Zara Hansen, Sarah E Lamb

Abstract

Group cognitive behavioural intervention (CBI) is effective in reducing low-back pain and disability in comparison to advice in primary care. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the impact of compliance on estimates of treatment effect and to identify factors associated with compliance.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Psychology 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 9 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,571,128
of 10,451,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#685
of 2,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,235
of 199,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#24
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,451,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.