↓ Skip to main content

Aquatic zooremediation: deploying animals to remediate contaminated aquatic environments

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Biotechnology, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aquatic zooremediation: deploying animals to remediate contaminated aquatic environments
Published in
Trends in Biotechnology, December 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.12.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Gifford, R. Hugh Dunstan, Wayne O’Connor, Claudia E. Koller, Geoff R. MacFarlane

Abstract

The ability of animals to act in a bioremediative capacity is not widely known. Animals are rarely considered for bioremediation initiatives owing to ethical or human health concerns. Nonetheless, specific examples in the literature reveal that some animal species are effective remediators of heavy metals, microbial contaminants, hydrocarbons, nutrients and persistent organic pollutants, particularly in an aquatic environment. Recent examples include deploying pearl oysters to remove metals and nutrients from aquatic ecosystems and the harvest of fish to remove polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from the Baltic. It is probable that many animal taxa will possess attributes amenable to bioremediation. We introduce zoological equivalents of the definitions used in phytoremediation literature (zooextraction, zootransformation, zoostabilization and animal hyperaccumulation), to serve as useful benchmarks in the evaluation of candidate animal species for zooremediation initiatives, and propose that recognition of the concept of zooremediation would act to stimulate discussion and future research in this area.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 184 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 38%
Environmental Science 39 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,798,065
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#700
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,760
of 167,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.