↓ Skip to main content

Panarchy: Theory and Application

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
697 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Panarchy: Theory and Application
Published in
Ecosystems, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9744-2
Authors

Craig R. Allen, David G. Angeler, Ahjond S. Garmestani, Lance H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 697 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
South Africa 4 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 663 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 185 27%
Student > Master 124 18%
Researcher 120 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 8%
Student > Bachelor 34 5%
Other 123 18%
Unknown 57 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 218 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 15%
Social Sciences 98 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 34 5%
Engineering 32 5%
Other 120 17%
Unknown 92 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,537,508
of 16,243,347 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#149
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,997
of 309,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,243,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.