You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The gray zone of the qualitative assessment of respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter in ICU patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13693 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Duwat, Elie Zogheib, Pierre Grégoire Guinot, Franck Levy, Faouzi Trojette, Momar Diouf, Michel Slama, Hervé Dupont |
| Abstract |
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a useful tool for minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ICU. Dynamic indices (such as the inferior vena cava distensibility index (dIVC)) can be used to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Although quantitative use of the dIVC has been validated, the routinely used qualitative (visual) approach had not been assessed prior to the present study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 68% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,913,296
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,912
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,207
of 321,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#60
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.