↓ Skip to main content

Chaperone use during intimate examinations in primary care: postal survey of family physicians

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chaperone use during intimate examinations in primary care: postal survey of family physicians
Published in
BMC Primary Care, December 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-6-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

David H Price, C Shawn Tracy, Ross EG Upshur

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,135
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,713
of 171,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.