↓ Skip to main content

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature
Published in
Critical Care, September 2005
DOI 10.1186/cc3803
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony Delaney, Sean M Bagshaw, Andre Ferland, Braden Manns, Kevin B Laupland, Christopher J Doig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 3 3%
Greece 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 97 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 14 13%
Other 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Other 31 30%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,994
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,686
of 70,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.