↓ Skip to main content

Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-5-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela Royle, Lynda Bain, Norman Waugh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 5%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Saudi Arabia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 75 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Other 6 7%
Other 26 31%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 42%
Psychology 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,098
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,172
of 140,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.