↓ Skip to main content

Reconstructing Disturbances and Their Biogeochemical Consequences over Multiple Timescales

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstructing Disturbances and Their Biogeochemical Consequences over Multiple Timescales
Published in
BioScience, January 2014
DOI 10.1093/biosci/bit017
Authors

Kendra K. McLauchlan, Philip E. Higuera, Daniel G. Gavin, Steven S. Perakis, Michelle C. Mack, Heather Alexander, John Battles, Franco Biondi, Brian Buma, Daniele Colombaroli, Sara K. Enders, Daniel R. Engstrom, Feng Sheng Hu, Jennifer R. Marlon, John Marshall, Matt McGlone, Jesse L. Morris, Lucas E. Nave, Bryan Shuman, Erica A. H. Smithwick, Dunia H. Urrego, David A. Wardle, Christopher J. Williams, Joseph J. Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 149 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 22%
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Professor 12 8%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 62 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 17%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 22 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,093,949
of 21,798,458 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,028
of 2,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,694
of 288,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#18
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,798,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.