Title |
Microenvironmental Variables Must Influence Intrinsic Phenotypic Parameters of Cancer Stem Cells to Affect Tumourigenicity
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003433 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jacob G. Scott, Anita B. Hjelmeland, Prakash Chinnaiyan, Alexander R. A. Anderson, David Basanta |
Abstract |
Since the discovery of tumour initiating cells (TICs) in solid tumours, studies focussing on their role in cancer initiation and progression have abounded. The biological interrogation of these cells continues to yield volumes of information on their pro-tumourigenic behaviour, but actionable generalised conclusions have been scarce. Further, new information suggesting a dependence of tumour composition and growth on the microenvironment has yet to be studied theoretically. To address this point, we created a hybrid, discrete/continuous computational cellular automaton model of a generalised stem-cell driven tissue with a simple microenvironment. Using the model we explored the phenotypic traits inherent to the tumour initiating cells and the effect of the microenvironment on tissue growth. We identify the regions in phenotype parameter space where TICs are able to cause a disruption in homeostasis, leading to tissue overgrowth and tumour maintenance. As our parameters and model are non-specific, they could apply to any tissue TIC and do not assume specific genetic mutations. Targeting these phenotypic traits could represent a generalizable therapeutic strategy across cancer types. Further, we find that the microenvironmental variable does not strongly affect the outcomes, suggesting a need for direct feedback from the microenvironment onto stem-cell behaviour in future modelling endeavours. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 32% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
Argentina | 2 | 3% |
Chile | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 35 | 56% |
Scientists | 25 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
India | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 57 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 28% |
Researcher | 16 | 25% |
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 9% |
Mathematics | 5 | 8% |
Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 11 | 17% |