↓ Skip to main content

PRIMITIVE SUBGROUPS AND PST-GROUPS

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PRIMITIVE SUBGROUPS AND PST-GROUPS
Published in
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, July 2013
DOI 10.1017/s0004972713000592
Authors

A. BALLESTER-BOLINCHES, J. C. BEIDLEMAN, R. ESTEBAN-ROMERO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,771,194
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society
#65
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,736
of 196,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.