↓ Skip to main content

Immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008842.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luit Penninga, Christian H Møller, Finn Gustafsson, Christian Gluud, Daniel A Steinbrüchel

Abstract

Heart transplantation has become a valuable and well-accepted treatment option for end-stage heart failure. Rejection of the transplanted heart by the recipient's body is a risk to the success of the procedure, and life-long immunosuppression is necessary to avoid this. Clear evidence is required to identify the best, safest and most effective immunosuppressive treatment strategy for heart transplant recipients. To date, there is no consensus on the use of immunosuppressive antibodies against T-cells for induction after heart transplantation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 20%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 26 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#10,024,018
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,585
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,176
of 235,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.