↓ Skip to main content

Postgraduate education in nutrition in south Asia: a huge mismatch between investments and needs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postgraduate education in nutrition in south Asia: a huge mismatch between investments and needs
Published in
BMC Medical Education, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shweta Khandelwal, Tanusree Paul, Lawrence Haddad, Surbhi Bhalla, Stuart Gillespie, Ramanan Laxminarayan

Abstract

Despite decades of nutrition advocacy and programming, the nutrition situation in South Asian countries is alarming. We assume that modern training in nutrition at the post graduate level is an important contributor to building the capacity of individuals to think and act effectively when combating undernutrition. In this context, this paper presents a regional situation analysis of master's level academic initiatives in nutrition with a special focus on the type of programme we think is most likely to be helpful in addressing undernutrition at the population level: Public Health Nutrition (PHN).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 22%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Social Sciences 18 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,628,633
of 23,845,863 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#194
of 3,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,135
of 309,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,845,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.